Uses of a Lensbaby 3G

Most people who know photography know what a Lensbaby 3G can do under normal circumstances. I decided to figure out how to do something unusual with it. First I decided to figure out how closely it could focus.



Not bad, then I tried REALLY extending it.



Better still, but what if I used that hacked Holga lens to get a little more magnification?



Well the quality isn't great, but it's interesting. Now what if I flipped my 50mm f/1.4 and put it in front of the 3G?



Now things are getting fun.



What if I just inverted the 50mm lens though? Surely what would look better.



Not at all. The 3G became a great way to control the aperture of a fully electronic lens. When I simply inverted the 50mm, I could shoot at nothing but f/1.4 because that is the widest aperture. The 3G however allows you to use a f/2.8 aperture ring to stop down a bit and widen the depth of field to something usable. Neat.

The Elders

Ian from The Elders, a group I had the pleasure of meeting at the 2008 Kansas City Music Fest. I got the chance to see them again last night locally and I couldn't resist the opportunity to take some pictures. This was my favorite of the night. Ian is playing his drum with water on the top for effect. It was slipped on there by this sly fellow by the name of Steve.



I highly, HIGHLY recommend The Elders. They put on a amazing and energetic show.

Using Ultra Wide Angle Lenses

When I first decided I wanted to have a "Ultra" wide lens, I was very misguided. I thought, I would find a lens that allowed me to make dramatic pictures out of beautiful landscapes and far off objects by encompassing more in the frame. What I got where tiny caricature of once grand wonders. My first ultra wide was the Canon EOS EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5. I was a nice lens, don't get me wrong. It is even faster at the wide end than my current Canon EOS EF 17-40mm f/4 L. I just didn't use it properly, and when I got a chance to sell it for a profit*, it was gone.

The problem wasn't my method, simply my application. Today when I want a striking landscape shot, I wait for it with either my 50mm f/1.4 or my 70-200mm f/2.8 IS and pick out the best subject from what is before me. When I want to exaggerate the heck out of something, I grab an ultra wide. Be it architectural, nature or even sometimes portrait photography, an ultra wide can have great uses, mainly to distort in some way. At a friend's wedding a while back I had to step in and be the substitute photographer because the one they hired was late, and less than skilled. I didn't have much equipment other than the 10-22 and a niftey fifty with me so it was a challenge, but here are some examples of what I did well and not so well with the 10-22.

First the poorly done.


Most of this picture is wasted space.


Other than the obvious faults in framing and composition, I mananged to make everyone look unnatural and the gentlemen at the egdes have been streched to unflattering purportions.

The slightly better.


Other than a face being obscurred, this picture came out much better. The guys look as though they have wide shoulders and nearly tower over you. They also appear much larger in comparison to their surroundings. The distrotion in this case doesn't detract, but rather enhances the desired effect. I wish I had understood this lens better. In hindsight I could have done some fun things with it at this wedding.

Weddings aren't really the best place to use a tool like this. The opertunities are few and if it is overused it becomes quite stale. This isn't to say it can't be used to go effect.


The young man on the right was the wild man of this wedding. Nothing but an ultra wide could have captured the mood that you see here.


Here is another that I really liked from the same wedding.

I think my flavor of the week subject material, when it comes to my 17-40mm, are equipment and cars. I can't get enough of the sense of size that the lens can produce.











In short, ultra wide angle lenses aren't at all what a lot of people expect them to be. Once you understand them, you realize what you were missing.





*I bought this lens used for $450 and sold with the hood I bought for an additional $45 for a sum of $600. All in all, it couldn't have worked out better for me.

Finding Your Soul Mate

Do you ever have one of those relationships where things hit rock bottom, but then once you work them out it is the most amazing experience ever?

I reconciled with digital photography today. I picked up a Canon 5D today because the price has dropped so drastically with the announcement of the Canon 5D Mark II. I'm pretty stunned. I know I jumped on this bandwagon late, but those who buy technology at the leading edge pay the heftiest toll. All I have to say is that I am much happier now. All of my EF lenses are behaving like themselves again! I'm not chucking the 40D in the trash however. It serves me quite well as a telephoto camera and it still finds its home on the end of my 70-200 f/2.8 IS.

Now onto the fun part. Here are some preliminary shots from the 5D. I won't bother with reviewing the camera. It has been done to death and I generally agree that it is fantastic.

Daisies

I like simple subjects like these daisies. I've been argued with recently that pictures like this aren't compelling. To that I ask, "Well then how does this picture make you feel?" I inevitably get a response similar to "Relaxed" or "Calm." To which I say, "I compel you to relax a bit."

Let's all relax a bit and enjoy a simple pleasure. Mine are flowers.

My Digital Blues

Digital photography is an absolute miracle of technology and has come a very long way from it's meager beginnings. It has revolutionized the industry of photography as well as bringing the hobby back to the masses. I use digital SLRs professionally and I almost couldn't imagine going back to the predigital days of wedding photography.

That being said, I think it is stealing my soul.

Slowly, but surely I am becoming less happy with my own photography. As far as the wedding photography goes I couldn't be happier, but the art that I so enjoy has suffered immensely. My digital pictures are nice and often pretty, but I find that I am much more likely to snap a hundred pictures and then just pick out the best than I am to take my time and capture an image worth studying. The gray scale rendition also leaves something to be desired. It looks to my eyes very fake and unflattering. This could be do in large part to the smaller dynamic range of the digital sensor when compared to film. This will surely change as time goes on, but as of 2008 there is a remarkable disparity in the dynamic range of film and digital sensors.

I've decided to set up this blog to discuss and share my resulting artistic works in film photography. My name adorns no accreditation as a great artist and I'll make no such claim. My technique is often flawed and my results less than perfect. I love to borrow images from the world and that is about all that can be said.

I'll start it off I suppose with a picture I recently took in Indianapolis on the way to the Kansas City Irish Fest.



This gentleman stopped by to enjoy a few moments of Millish preforming and his attire transported me back to a whole other time. I wish people still wore hats.